Saturday 13 February 2010

My Newspaper by Ivars Gravlejs


Continuing with the theme of Photo-manipulation, I recently came across the work of Ivars Gravlejs.

'The project “My Newspaper” was realized during one year while I was working as a photoreporter in one of the main daily Czech newspapers - “Deník”.
Everyday from photo editors and journalists I got several assignments to photograph events around Prague. Before sending photographs to the newspaper's Photobank I quickly manipulated them in Photoshop. Originally idea was to change some little, unimportant details where the manipulation wouldn't change much the content of the photograph, for example, adding some more buttons on writer's Zdenek Mahler T-shirt or painting inscription - „Cunt“ on the brick wall. Although during the process it happened to make some more radical ones, for example, creating a traffic jam on the highway or cutting of singer's José Carreras finger. The aim of this project was to make an absurd, nonsense manipulation over the media manipulations.' Ivars Gravlejs


'This manipulation I did in a few minutes - I erased a hand of another singer and Carrera's finger, because in a photojournalism "the cut off a hand" is a mistake.'


'Here on the foreigners T-shirt I wrote "SMRT" (DEATH). It's my message to police.'


'On the 31st of August I had to photograph the traffic jam. I came to the place, but there was no jam. To get the picture I had a possiblity to throw a brick on the highway or to choose the less painful way - to go home and make the photo in peace. (The most crucial issues for the newspaper "Denik" are traffic jams, dirty streets and parks, homeless, foreigners and the weather.)'


'Gravlejs project is a typical example of so called „Subversive Art“. Art which is parasitic on the concrete subject and affects this subject (in this case media society), undermines and criticizes it. On the one hand Ivars Gravlejs deconstructs authority of medial business, deconstructs authenticity and objectivity of information (in any way medialized and interpreted), but on the other hand Gravlejs contemplates about circumstances of contemporary artist, who often has to suspend his/her creative process in order to earn money for living. Gravlejs carefully „smuggled“ his art in his everyday „Non-Art“ activity.' Milan Mikuláštík

Airbrushing

A few years ago I had heard rumours that a certain film had spent an obscene amount (apparently millions) on having to clean up images of Keira Knightley post filming as there were apparently issue with her skin complection. Recently I stumbled across Charles Arthur's brilliant 'How we Learned to Love Photoshop' article which had an example of a Keria Knightley before and after.

Recently I have been more and more aware of an increasing number of Photoshop/airbrushing related articles in the mainstream media. In The Word magazine earlier this year I saw a great article that I've been trying to get my hands on by Andrew Harrison which showed some fantastic examples of airbrushing.
One image which is particularly memorable that I have managed to retrieve from Google is the image of a shark attacking a military helicopter which was released in August 2002. Initially people did believe that the image was real, but it did later transpire that it was infact two seperate images skillfully Photoshopped together.


Charles Arthur enlightens his readers with the history of Photoshop saying, 'Photoshop has, like Google, transcended its origins in the world of ­computing, and become a verb. But whereas "to Google" is almost always used positively to express usefulness, Photoshopping is almost always a term of abuse: "That picture was Photo shopped" has become a shorthand way of saying it is untrustworthy and misleading...

...But it was Photoshop that made altering images routine. It began ­circumspectly as a program written by Thomas Knoll, who, in the autumn of 1987, was doing in a PhD in computer vision but for fun wrote a program to display images with grey in them on a black-and-white monitor. Knoll called the program Display, writing it on his Mac Plus computer. Then his brother John, who worked at George Lucas's Industrial Light and Magic company, which did the visual effects for the Star Wars films, noticed its potential. They collaborated, bought a Macintosh II – capable of displaying colours! – and set to work; the program's name mutated until they hit on Photoshop.

In September 1988, Adobe Systems signed a licence to distribute it – wisely, the Knolls took a royalties deal that made them very rich. And on 19 February 1990, Photoshop 1.0 became available. At the time it fitted on to a single floppy disk – nowadays it takes a DVD – although it had, even then, fallen foul of piracy after the Knolls demonstrated it to some Apple engineers, who "shared" the demo disks that were left behind with a few hundred of their closest friends. Nowadays, Photoshop is reckoned to be one of the most pirated programs in the world, behind Microsoft's Windows. Its high price – around £560 – is indicative of the fact it has no real rivals.

Photoshop quickly became embedded in computer culture. Apple would try to prove its computers were faster than those running Windows by holding "Photoshop bake-offs" during Steve Jobs's keynote addresses: a Windows machine and an Apple one would run through an automated process to tweak and manipulate an image in exactly the same way. Oddly enough, the Apple machine always won.

Photoshop has even created its own two-player sport, "layer tennis". The first player "serves" an image: the opponent then alters it and sends it back; the first player continues the process. Done in public, with commentary, it takes on its own strange allure.

Do not, though, expect to join the ranks of elite players immediately. Seeing Photoshop running on a computer is like viewing the cockpit of a 747; what, you wonder, do all those buttons do? Many experts say they have taught themselves how to use it over a decade or more. Creative technology consultant Richard Elen describes it as less like flying a plane, more like dealing with a huge house – some people never visit all the rooms. "I probably use 50%-70% of what the apps can do," Elen says. "There are features I seldom, if ever, use. Others I use all the time – clone tools, for instance [which copy an item inside an image] – and I think I'm fairly adept at them."

Russell Quinn, a computer scientist and self-taught Photoshop user, says it's "akin to picking up a guitar for the first time. The whole world is there for the taking, but it's difficult to get started." He thinks two years is a reasonable timescale to get on top of it.

Steve Caplin, who has done photomontages for the Guardian for 20 years, recalls his first use of the program: "An illustration in Punch of the Queen. Photoshop was very much simpler then, but it had real power." He too has featured on the Photoshop Disasters blog – "A missing shoulder on the cover of my book, ironically called How to Cheat in ­Photoshop!" – and says he feels real sympathy for those who have run into trouble with the program.

"It's all too easy to overlook something that's then blindingly obvious when it's printed. It's just like spelling mistakes in print, really." ' (Charles Arthur)

There are Blogs out there which cover the good, the bad and the ugly of Photoshopping/airbrushing. Photoshop Disasters in particular does bring a big smile to my face when looking at some of the extreme examples and humorous comments attached, a nice bit of morning viewing to get my day started with a smile!

Thursday 4 February 2010

Jonny Briggs

Earlier this year I visited the Royal College of Art work in progress show, which showcased work from Textiles, Fine Art Photography and GSMJ. The exhibition is always packed with a multitude of students work and because of this I always find it really difficult to digest and remember the work. However, one month on and Jonny Briggs manipulated photography pieces still remain vivid in my mind.



Tuesday 2 February 2010

Fakes and Forgeries @ V&A

I couldn't resist revisiting the Decode exhibition at the V&A again yesterday, I really am making the most of my entitlement to free entry.  Whilst I was there I popped down to the Fakes and Forgeries exhibition, which showcases some of the fakes that the Metropolitan Police have collected.  

It did get me thinking about Art especially in terms of how I was taught Art at a young age.  I remember through school students were encouraged to copy great works of art, and by the end of secondary school I had already ripped off Matisse, Mondrianne and Picasso.  I recall in my fourth or fifth year at secondary school agonising over a making a replica of a Toulouse Lautrec painting.  The results were pretty dismal, hands and feet were never my forte.  At the time I blamed it on the poor choice of the schools available materials, acrylic paint rather than opting for the more authentic and more expensive choice of oil paints.  Even before secondary school I was copying images, it was mainly images of Garfield and Snoopy, and most of the time they looked like they'd been mowed over by a steamroller or put through an industrial mincer.  Had my attempts at Lautrec's dancing girl been more successful my career choice could well have been very different, and I'm sure the forgery trade must be far more lucrative than textile design (which I would like to add I am directing myself away from).
I guess the only difference is between a forgery and what I and many other school children do/have done is that we are not making very convincing pieces of work and trying to call them originals.
It takes great skill to replicate perfectly a great piece of work, a steady and adaptable hand which can replicate a great masters brush stroke and a sharp eye for detail and colour.  John Myatt's name/forgeries pops up in the exhibition frequently, which does leave me questioning is he actually a good forgerer if he's been caught?
Top Right - Cello Player in the style of Albert Gleizes (1881-1953), created by convicted criminal John Myatt in the 1990's
Top Middle - Untitled in the style of Mark Gertler (1891-1939), created by convicted criminal John Myatt in the 1990's
Top Right - Balloon Girl in the style of Banksy (active from the late 1980's)
Bottom left - Coins in the style of Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon coins, recovered in the criminal investigation of David Hutchings in 2007.
Bottom Right - King David in the style of Marc Chagall (1887-1985), created by convicted criminal John Myatt in the 1990's. 

Monday 1 February 2010

Pascual Sisto

Pascual Sisto's manipulated videos are amazing!!! I particularly love 
'No Strings Attached' and the simplicity of his installation pieces from 
the Heavy Hues series are equally powerful and engaging.


G8 - from the series Heavy Hues


Bow - from the series Heavy Hues

No Strings Attached

28 Years in the Implicate Order


No Not Nothing Never